# Query performance with large(r) inputs

**URL:** <https://forum.datomic.com/t/query-performance-with-large-r-inputs/1508>\
**Category:** Datomic Pro\
**Created:** [July 1, 2020, 5:00pm UTC](https://forum.datomic.com/t/query-performance-with-large-r-inputs/1508 "2020-07-01T17:00:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nikolayandr](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.datomic.com/nikolayandr/32/375_2.png) [@nikolayandr](https://forum.datomic.com/u/nikolayandr)\
**Post date:** [July 11, 2025, 12:17pm UTC](https://forum.datomic.com/t/query-performance-with-large-r-inputs/1508/3 "2025-07-11T12:17:19Z")

</div>

Hi @bhurlow, were you able to solve your issue? I have a similar one [Performance degradation and heap overflow with large collection binding input](https://forum.datomic.com/t/performance-degradation-and-heap-overflow-with-large-collection-binding-input/2572), but I have not found a suitable solution yet. Thanks

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.datomic.com/t/query-performance-with-large-r-inputs/1508)._