# Dev-local 0.9.183 now available **URL:** \ **Category:** Announcements\ **Created:** [July 21, 2020, 8:23pm UTC](https://forum.datomic.com/t/dev-local-0-9-183-now-available/1526 "2020-07-21T20:23:37Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 5\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![jaret](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.datomic.com/jaret/32/45_2.png) [@jaret](https://forum.datomic.com/u/jaret)\ **Post date:** [July 21, 2020, 8:23pm UTC](https://forum.datomic.com/t/dev-local-0-9-183-now-available/1526/1 "2020-07-21T20:23:37Z")
Version 0.9.183 of Datomic dev-local is now available for download. See [http://docs.datomic.com/cloud/dev-local.html](http://docs.datomic.com/cloud/dev-local.html) ## Changes ### 07/21/2020 - 0.9.183 - Update: use latest Client API ### 07/21/2020 - 0.8.102 - Client-Cloud Update - Fix: `datomic.api.client.async/client` now accepts `:dev-local` as a `:server-type` ---
**Author:** ![onetom](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.datomic.com/onetom/32/430_2.png) [@onetom](https://forum.datomic.com/u/onetom)\ **Post date:** [July 22, 2020, 4:49am UTC](https://forum.datomic.com/t/dev-local-0-9-183-now-available/1526/2 "2020-07-22T04:49:43Z")
How do we know which version of the Client API is this library using? Or is it something which shouldn’t matter much? ---
**Author:** ![onetom](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.datomic.com/onetom/32/430_2.png) [@onetom](https://forum.datomic.com/u/onetom)\ **Post date:** [July 22, 2020, 5:00am UTC](https://forum.datomic.com/t/dev-local-0-9-183-now-available/1526/3 "2020-07-22T05:00:30Z")
Would it be possible to use ISO date format, like on the [Datomic](https://my.datomic.com/downloads/pro) page? Datomic - like most software - is an international product, so it would make sense to use a more international convention. I live in Hong Kong btw, and the date format here is the same or similar, but I still can’t remember after 7 years, whether it’s DD/MM or MM/DD. Wikipedia says: > Dates written in Hong Kong and Macau are often formatted in the DD.MM.YYYY style due to European influences. Nonetheless, the Chinese form of the dates is still read in the same way as described above. Visas for the People’s Republic of China also conform to this format. — [Date and time notation in Asia - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_and_time_notation_in_Asia#:~:text=Dates+written+in+Hong+Kong,same+way+as+described+above). but I think I see MM/DD more in practice. Such a nuisance… ---
**Author:** ![jaret](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.datomic.com/jaret/32/45_2.png) [@jaret](https://forum.datomic.com/u/jaret)\ **Post date:** [July 22, 2020, 1:25pm UTC](https://forum.datomic.com/t/dev-local-0-9-183-now-available/1526/4 "2020-07-22T13:25:27Z")
Hi @onetom, > How do we know which version of the Client API is this library using? > Or is it something which shouldn’t matter much? `dev-local` follows the same conventions of any `.jar`. You can examine the deps included with the jar. For example, if you’re using clojure and include the `.jar` you can review the deps with `-Stree`: ```auto clojure -Stree ``` > Would it be possible to use ISO date format, like on the [Datomic](https://my.datomic.com/downloads/pro) page? I’ll discuss changing the dates with the team. ---
**Author:** ![onetom](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/forum.datomic.com/onetom/32/430_2.png) [@onetom](https://forum.datomic.com/u/onetom)\ **Post date:** [July 22, 2020, 2:53pm UTC](https://forum.datomic.com/t/dev-local-0-9-183-now-available/1526/5 "2020-07-22T14:53:20Z")
> [@jaret](#): > > You can examine the deps included with the jar. Sorry, I meant, how can I tell the client version without downloading `dev-local`, since that version “communicates” the available features (like the android api levels) and bug fixes. But indeed, it’s not that important, I just have to get more fluent with the options of Clojure CLI. Thanks taking the date format into consideration!